force is energy
energy creates life
life is in the image of its creator
thus force breads life in its image
force is not the way
the way, is the way
it always has been
and always will be
it hides in plain sight
never asking to be seen

i walk in the shower of love in the summer time, in the winter i walk in water puddles. In the slush too, but sometimes i get into bigger things. like meditation, and my inner voice tells me to write, then the alarm rings.

Why do humans always cross lines?
I used to take pride in crossing lines, but I was only fooling myself because there are far many more lines I dare not cross. There are human forces on my back so heavy that I dare not test them, because breaking down a barrier never begets love without its twin, hate. Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and she can be praised for taking that leap for mankind, or she can be blamed for bringing us away from ignorance and bliss.
For once, let’s just chill. No crossing of lines, no progress, no knowledge. Please, let’s just chill.

Curiosity is an interesting emotion (is it an emotion?). First of all I wonder where we would be without it. My guess is a lot less technologically advanced. Perhaps still in the ocean. Was the act of crawling out of the sea an act of curiosity? Was the first amoeba splitting because it wanted to see what would happen when it did? It makes me wonder, when an amoeba splits, which of the resulting two is the original.

Besides all that meaningless pondering, I wonder where curiosity is leading us. Are we walking a definite path? Possibly, since we live in this universe and since curiosity is the drive to uncover the secrets of this universe then perhaps there is only one end and that is total and complete understanding of this reality, which in itself (I suspect) would be a new beginning. On the other hand there may be no definitive end to what one can know about this universe. It is an unimaginably enormous place and to think that one species can possibly comprehend it all can seem laughable.

Either way this trip is certainly not lacking in uniqueness or fascination, so I say we just sit back and enjoy the ride.

do we exist?
a question centuries old and centuries evasive.
many have had a lot to say. many smarter than i.
however my recent thoughts are as follows:
the question is invalid in its current form. a definition cannot contain that term which it strives to define. thus to define a being we must ask: what is a being? ( a being used as something which exists) however the “is” in that question corrupts the whole concept as we are using the term for existense in our quest to determine what existence is.
we all know what existence is we are doing it. if i said to you, that there tree exists you would know what i was trying to convey to you. yet we must remember that concepts exist in the same way as you or i. 2 + 2 = 5 exists and will always regardless of our exsitence (as will silly playful theorms about triangles and squares and the like). the existence of ideas is central. however i am not summizing the Cogito for you here. after a considerable number of Pabst Blue Ribbon with monseur Descartes last weekend we decided he was quite happily retired. Heiddeger lended some ideas but his english left something to be desired. Thus with a belly full of cheap beer and a head full of wiskey my associates and i have decieded to puruse and new course. a new anti-ontological science free of the onitc and even less full of beings of beings in being. the new science of anti-ontology, or nihilology shall aim as its sole goal to categorize all those things which do not exist. who knows what we shall find. we are know excepting donations on paypal and at shady gas station nearest you.