Even more everything
All of existence is non-simultaneously apprehended interacting processing.
All of existence is infinite regression.
All of existence is.
Infinity.
Therefore…
All of non-existence is not? Or is it?
|
|
|
All of existence is non-simultaneously apprehended interacting processing.
All of existence is infinite regression.
All of existence is.
Infinity.
Therefore…
All of non-existence is not? Or is it?
Where does the physical start and the mind end?
I often find myself categorizing the the physical is somehow more “real” then whatever else there is. This whatever else, my perception for instance, is in reality the only thing that I can say is “real” as it is the only thing that I can truly grasp.
So there is this glaring question. What is this only real thing that I can grasp if it is not somehow physical? Where does “reality” stop and physicality begin if these things are in fact different?
It is often said that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. So if this is the case then doesn’t it seem reasonable to say that everything is one thing. So which one is it? Do we live in a purely physical world, where everything is in fact a function of physical interactions or alternatively are we in a world where everything is a function of perception where this idea of perception is all that there is without what we deem a “physical” world.
Whichever way it is I’m going to keep convincing myself that this coffee I’m drinking is delicious no matter what my senses keep telling me.
We as humans play games.
When we are bored we create these pockets of purpose in our lives to use our minds with.
What do games say about humans?
Are the games we play just meaningless time fillers or do they say something more about the human condition.
Games require us to think about something within a confined space. We assign rules to certain interactions so that they can have forced consequences. Sometimes the consequences are not what we thought they would be.
In games we find these unanswered questions.
We play.
With each new game we discover something new, about the game, about ourselves as players.
What would happen if….
Becomes the question and we have the ability to play out possibilities to run our thought process to a conclusion and then once the sum of all the thought that has gone into a game is completed the game is destroyed. You pick up the pieces and you play again. You have to get better somehow.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||