All of existence is non-simultaneously apprehended interacting processing.

All of existence is infinite regression.

All of existence is.

Infinity.

Therefore…
All of non-existence is not? Or is it?

La la la la la la la la la la
I don’t want to know!

google news headlines currently include - iran’s president dismisses the holocaust as ‘myth’, the house of representatives approved an extension of the patriot act, Bush takes responsebility for using ‘faulty’ evidence to go to war (although still claims Hussein was a threat to the U.S.), Microsoft and MTV are starting a new music download service that also allows you to download MTV shows… BLAH BLAH BLAH

and to boot, it’s finals week and I have WAY too much work left to do.

Time to close my eyes and pretend I’M NOT HERE. I’m on the moon. Look at that shit! It’s huge!

Open source android dream as your screensaver.

baaaaaaaaaahhh

How is it that I’ve reimprinted myself to skim over the intended meaning of a statement and see right through to its potential?

I no longer take anything at face value, I’m always digging for a deeper meaning; I want to break functional fixedness and exploit new ways of using old tools.

Ideally this is a gift worth using, but mostly it just gets me into trouble. When someone tells me a law, I test every case for potential to work around the law.

For once I want to be sucked in and go with the flow. I don’t want to feel like I’m on the outside looking in; I want to glide through the middle of the stream.

Tomorrow I’ll write a post about the dangers of getting sucked it, but for now I just want to feel the power of society; I want to feel the camaraderie of equally ignorant swimmers.

So how’m I doing?

Everything is
non-simultaneously apprehended interacting processing.

(re-read the above sentence until understanding is reached.)